Every prevention setting is a trade-off. A bigger incentive convinces more shoppers to stay — and it eats into margin on every order it touches, not just the ones it changed. A minimum purchase amount can filter out buyers who would have converted anyway. Letting the incentive stack with other discounts can compound cost you never planned for.
Pick any of these settings by feel and you’re either giving away more than you need to, or holding back an incentive that would have added revenue. There’s no way to know which without comparing two setups against each other, on the same store, at the same time.
That’s what A/B testing is for: instead of deciding by instinct, two configurations run side by side on real shoppers, and you read off which one actually wins.